Skip navigation.

www.BirthTraumaLaw.com
www.LesionesNatales.com

Free Consultation. Call Today.
1-(800)-460-0606

Servicing Clients Nationwide.

Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP

Archive for the ‘Brain Damage’ Category

Baby slings responsible for infant deaths

Saturday, March 27th, 2010

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is advising parents and caregivers to be cautious when using infant slings for babies younger than four months of age.

In researching incident reports from the past 20 years, CPSC identified and is investigating at least 14 deaths associated with sling-style infant carriers, including three in 2009. Twelve of the deaths involved babies younger than four months of age.

Three baby deaths could be traced to Infantino baby slings. In response, the CPSC has recalled more than 1 million slings.

Slings can pose two different types of suffocation hazards to babies. In the first few months of life, babies cannot control their heads because of weak neck muscles. The sling’s fabric can press against an infant’s nose and mouth, blocking the baby’s breathing and rapidly suffocating a baby within a minute or two. Additionally, where a sling keeps the infant in a curled position bending the chin toward the chest, the airways can be restricted, limiting the oxygen supply. The baby will not be able to cry for help and can slowly suffocate.

Many of the babies who died in slings were either a low birth weight twin, were born prematurely, or had breathing issues such as a cold. Therefore, CPSC urges parents of preemies, twins, babies in fragile health and those with low weight to use extra care and consult their pediatricians about using slings.

Two months ago, the Commission added slings to the list of durable infant products that require a mandatory standard. Additionally, CPSC staff is actively investigating these products to determine what additional action may be appropriate. Until a mandatory standard is developed, CPSC is working with ASTM International to quickly complete an effective voluntary standard for infant sling carriers.

CPSC recommends that parents and caregivers make sure the infant’s face is not covered and is visible at all times to the sling’s wearer. If nursing the baby in a sling, change the baby’s position after feeding so the baby’s head is facing up and is clear of the sling and the mother’s body. Parents and caregivers should be vigilant about frequently checking their baby in a sling.

CPSC is interested in receiving incident or injury reports that are directly related to infant slings. You can do this by visiting www.cpsc.gov/cgibin/incident.aspx or call CPSC’s Hotline at (800) 638-2772.

Source:  U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

China will look into report of cadmium in childrens’ jewelry

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

Wal-Mart and Claire’s have pulled Chinese-made children’s jewelry suspected to have been made with cadmium.

The decision to two of American’s largest retailers of costume jewelry comes on the heels of an investigation by the Associated Press which found some products contained dangerous levels of the toxic metal.

Lab tests conducted for the AP on 103 pieces of low-priced children’s jewelry on sale in the U.S. found 12 items with elevated levels of cadmium, which can hinder brain development in young children, according to recent research, and is known to cause cancer.

Twelve items had cadmium levels of at least 10 percent by weight. One piece had 91 percent, and others contained more than 80%. The government has no restrictions on cadmium in jewelry.

The findings of cadmium contamination come on the heels of a string of product quality scandals in 2007 that caused Congress in 2008 to ban toys and other kids products that contain lead — another dangerous and once commonly used material. Cadmium is even more harmful.

One of three Paxil lawsuits settled

Monday, October 13th, 2008

First Men in the Moon ipod Anastasia movie download

The Warriors download

Joy Ride: Dead Ahead download
Two lawsuits filed by West Virginia families claim the antidepressant Paxil was responsible for their children’s birth defects.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced in December 2005 that it was requiring Glaxo to add warnings of birth defects to the drug’s prescribing information. This decision was fueled by two studies that showed that women who took Paxil during the first three months of pregnancy were about one and a half to two times as likely to have a baby with a heart defect than women who took other antidepressants or women in the general population.

The lawsuits claim that Glaxo knew that Paxil was associated with birth defects prior to the 2005 label change and that the heart birth defects that are present in their children wre the result of their mother’s Paxil use during pregnancy.

North to Alaska release

The women involved in the lawsuits claim that they took Paxil because Glaxo promoted the drug as a safe alternative to pregnant women. However, when their children were born, they suffered from congenital injuries and disorders and birth defects, as well as heart defects and developmental delays.

Also, a class action lawsuit has been settled that will reimburse health plans that paid for children and young adults who receive Paxil. While the drug is not approved for use in children, doctors often prescribe the drug when they see fit. While Paxil isn’t necessarily a defective drug, several studies have shown that Paxil and similar antidepressants cause suicides in teenagers.

Biggest Wednesday: Condition Black full movie

If you or a member of your family were prescribed Paxil and suffered adverse side effects, you should contact an experienced defective drug attorney for professional insight.