<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Birth Injury and Cerebral Palsy Attorneys &#187; Premature Birth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/category/premature-birth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com</link>
	<description>Helping victims of birth injuries, including cerebral palsy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:41:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mother Of Twins Dies After C-Section</title>
		<link>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/12/mother-of-twins-dies-after-c-section/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/12/mother-of-twins-dies-after-c-section/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mikedavidson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premature Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth injury attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain injuries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/?p=5349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The C-Section is a procedure that continues to grow in popularity in the United States. Whether it is required in order to prevent birth injuries, or simply done because the mother thinks it will be easier than standard birth, the procedure is not without risks.</p>
<p>Mother-to-be Michal Friedman was scheduled for surgery in a Manhattan hospital for November 28, but when doctors found her blood pressure was elevated in her November 27 pre-op appointment, they rescheduled her for a same-day surgery.</p>
<p>Doctors performed a C-section on Friedman. After the surgery, she hemorrhaged. As her husband watched, her condition steadily declined, prompting doctors to request he leave the room. At 9:30 p.m., doctors informed him of the death of his wife.</p>
<p>C-sections have become so common that many people do not consider that the procedure is a surgical one, and with all surgeries, there are risks.</p>
<p>In C-sections, the most common cause of death is bleeding. It can be fast and severe and by the time doctors attempt to address it, it can be too late.</p>
<p>The procedure also comes with risk of bladder injury, infection, bowel injuries and blood clots.</p>
<p>Perhaps Frieman’s C-section prevented potential <a title="Link to information about infant brain injuries" href="http://www.birthtraumalaw.com/brain_injury.html">brain injuries</a> or other birth defects in her newborn twins. It is heartbreaking that she had to pay for that safety with her life.</p>
<p><strong>Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP – </strong><a title="Link to learn more about our birth injury law firm" href="http://www.birthtraumalaw.com/firm.html">birth injury attorneys</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The C-Section is a procedure that continues to grow in popularity in the United States. Whether it is required in order to prevent birth injuries, or simply done because the mother thinks it will be easier than standard birth, the procedure is not without risks.</p>
<p>Mother-to-be Michal Friedman was scheduled for surgery in a Manhattan hospital for November 28, but when doctors found her blood pressure was elevated in her November 27 pre-op appointment, they rescheduled her for a same-day surgery.</p>
<p>Doctors performed a C-section on Friedman. After the surgery, she hemorrhaged. As her husband watched, her condition steadily declined, prompting doctors to request he leave the room. At 9:30 p.m., doctors informed him of the death of his wife.</p>
<p>C-sections have become so common that many people do not consider that the procedure is a surgical one, and with all surgeries, there are risks.</p>
<p>In C-sections, the most common cause of death is bleeding. It can be fast and severe and by the time doctors attempt to address it, it can be too late.</p>
<p>The procedure also comes with risk of bladder injury, infection, bowel injuries and blood clots.</p>
<p>Perhaps Frieman’s C-section prevented potential <a title="Link to information about infant brain injuries" href="http://www.birthtraumalaw.com/brain_injury.html">brain injuries</a> or other birth defects in her newborn twins. It is heartbreaking that she had to pay for that safety with her life.</p>
<p><strong>Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP – </strong><a title="Link to learn more about our birth injury law firm" href="http://www.birthtraumalaw.com/firm.html">birth injury attorneys</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/12/mother-of-twins-dies-after-c-section/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steroids Help Reduce Preterm Infant Mortality</title>
		<link>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/12/steroids-help-reduce-preterm-infant-mortality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/12/steroids-help-reduce-preterm-infant-mortality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mikedavidson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Trauma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premature Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth injury attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/?p=5347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A newly published study has demonstrated that giving steroids to pregnant women at risk for preterm birth may boost an infant’s chance of survival and reduce the risk of serious developmental issues</p>
<p>The study, published in the Dec. 7 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, shows that the current guidelines, which suggest prenatal steroids be administered to women who are at risk for delivering between the 24<sup>th</sup> and 34<sup>th</sup> week of pregnancy, can be expanded to the 23<sup>rd</sup> week.</p>
<p>The steroids help the infants with lung development, which increases the odds of survival and reduces the risk of <a title="Link to information about infant brain injury" href="http://www.birthtraumalaw.com/brain_injury.html">brain injury</a>.</p>
<p>Dr. Wally Carlo, director of the division of neonatology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, authored the newly published study.</p>
<p>“When given as early as 23 weeks, prenatal or antenatal steroids reduce an infant’s risk of death and important developmental issues,” said Dr. Carlo.</p>
<p>Currently there is an absence of clear guidelines directing the use of prenatal steroids. According to the study, about 40 percent of women who showed signs of preterm labor at 23 weeks were not treated with steroids.</p>
<p>“There is a huge potential to increase the use of prenatal steroids,” said Dr. Carlo. “Mothers need to know that there is a lot that physicians can do to improve the outcome for these babies.”</p>
<p><strong>Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP – </strong><a title="Link to learn more about our birth injury law firm" href="http://www.birthtraumalaw.com/firm.html">birth injury attorneys</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A newly published study has demonstrated that giving steroids to pregnant women at risk for preterm birth may boost an infant’s chance of survival and reduce the risk of serious developmental issues</p>
<p>The study, published in the Dec. 7 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, shows that the current guidelines, which suggest prenatal steroids be administered to women who are at risk for delivering between the 24<sup>th</sup> and 34<sup>th</sup> week of pregnancy, can be expanded to the 23<sup>rd</sup> week.</p>
<p>The steroids help the infants with lung development, which increases the odds of survival and reduces the risk of <a title="Link to information about infant brain injury" href="http://www.birthtraumalaw.com/brain_injury.html">brain injury</a>.</p>
<p>Dr. Wally Carlo, director of the division of neonatology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, authored the newly published study.</p>
<p>“When given as early as 23 weeks, prenatal or antenatal steroids reduce an infant’s risk of death and important developmental issues,” said Dr. Carlo.</p>
<p>Currently there is an absence of clear guidelines directing the use of prenatal steroids. According to the study, about 40 percent of women who showed signs of preterm labor at 23 weeks were not treated with steroids.</p>
<p>“There is a huge potential to increase the use of prenatal steroids,” said Dr. Carlo. “Mothers need to know that there is a lot that physicians can do to improve the outcome for these babies.”</p>
<p><strong>Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP – </strong><a title="Link to learn more about our birth injury law firm" href="http://www.birthtraumalaw.com/firm.html">birth injury attorneys</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/12/steroids-help-reduce-preterm-infant-mortality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Premature Babies, More Brain Damage</title>
		<link>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/12/more-premature-babies-more-brain-damage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/12/more-premature-babies-more-brain-damage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 17:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mikedavidson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Trauma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cerebral Palsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premature Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth trauma lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premature babies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/?p=5324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Over 60,000 babies are born each year weighing less than 3.3 pounds. Modern medicine is allowing most premature babies to survive, but many will suffer some form of brain damage.</p>
<p>“That means that overall rates of cerebral palsy and other neurodevelopmental disabilities are on the rise,” says David Rowitch, chief of neonatology at the University of California, San Francisco.</p>
<p>According to Rowitch, lack of oxygen is the chief cause of brain injury in premature infants. White matter, where the “communication highways” reside, carrying messages through the brain and to the body, is damaged by oxygen deprivation.</p>
<p>Rowitch originally discovered the white matter damage by examining dead infants, but recently has been able to take over 250 premature babies through an MRI by using a special incubator designed to go through the scanner. This allows scientists to detect damage to white matter immediately.</p>
<p>Now that scientists can detect the damage, they need a way to prevent or repair it.</p>
<p>Though some treatments are still years away from human trials, there are some available now, including magnetic stimulation of certain areas of the brain and temporarily lowering the body temperature of the premature infants.</p>
<p>Was your child born premature? Did they suffer any birth defects or <a title="Link to information about infant brain injuries" href="http://www.birthtraumalaw.com/brain_injury.html">brain injuries</a>?</p>
<p><strong>Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP – </strong><a title="Link to learn more about our birth trauma law firm" href="http://www.birthtraumalaw.com/firm.html">Birth trauma lawyers</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over 60,000 babies are born each year weighing less than 3.3 pounds. Modern medicine is allowing most premature babies to survive, but many will suffer some form of brain damage.</p>
<p>“That means that overall rates of cerebral palsy and other neurodevelopmental disabilities are on the rise,” says David Rowitch, chief of neonatology at the University of California, San Francisco.</p>
<p>According to Rowitch, lack of oxygen is the chief cause of brain injury in premature infants. White matter, where the “communication highways” reside, carrying messages through the brain and to the body, is damaged by oxygen deprivation.</p>
<p>Rowitch originally discovered the white matter damage by examining dead infants, but recently has been able to take over 250 premature babies through an MRI by using a special incubator designed to go through the scanner. This allows scientists to detect damage to white matter immediately.</p>
<p>Now that scientists can detect the damage, they need a way to prevent or repair it.</p>
<p>Though some treatments are still years away from human trials, there are some available now, including magnetic stimulation of certain areas of the brain and temporarily lowering the body temperature of the premature infants.</p>
<p>Was your child born premature? Did they suffer any birth defects or <a title="Link to information about infant brain injuries" href="http://www.birthtraumalaw.com/brain_injury.html">brain injuries</a>?</p>
<p><strong>Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP – </strong><a title="Link to learn more about our birth trauma law firm" href="http://www.birthtraumalaw.com/firm.html">Birth trauma lawyers</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/12/more-premature-babies-more-brain-damage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Withdrawal of Treatment Top Cause of Death in NICU</title>
		<link>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/07/withdrawal-of-treatment-top-cause-of-death-in-nicu/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/07/withdrawal-of-treatment-top-cause-of-death-in-nicu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Premature Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth trauma attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth trauma lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/?p=5118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to UPI, the primary cause of infant death in a neonatal intensive care unit is withdrawing support and withholding lifesaving measures, say U.S. researchers. Dr. Julie Weiner of Children’s Mercy Hospital and colleagues examined medical records of 414 infants who died from January 1999 to December 2008 at a regional neonatal intensive care unit.</p>
<p>The study found that most U.S. childhood deaths occur during the neonatal period and most neonatal deaths are caused by a decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining measures. Of the 414 infant  deaths studied, 45 percent were due to major birth defects. Seventeen percent of these infants were very preterm and 35 percent of deaths were of very preterm births without congenital birth defects or <a href="http://www.birthtraumalaw.com/brain_injury.html" title="Link to information about brain injury at birth">brain injury</a>, said the study.</p>
<p>The study published in the Archives of Pediatrics &#038; Adolescent Medicine found that during the 10-year period, 61.6 percent of infant deaths followed withdrawal of treatment, 20.8 percent followed withholding of treatment and 17.6 percent died despite attempted resuscitation.</p>
<p>Admission diagnoses for the Children’s Mercy Hospital were placed into three categories: very preterm, congenital anomaly and other including children being born after 32 weeks without congenital anomalies. Although the study found no change in frequency of withdrawal of treatment, there was a significant increase in withholding of treatment for very preterm infants.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP. – <strong><a title="Meet Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP birth trauma lawyers" href="http://www.birthtraumalaw.com/attorneys.html" target="_blank">birth trauma lawyers</a></strong></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to UPI, the primary cause of infant death in a neonatal intensive care unit is withdrawing support and withholding lifesaving measures, say U.S. researchers. Dr. Julie Weiner of Children’s Mercy Hospital and colleagues examined medical records of 414 infants who died from January 1999 to December 2008 at a regional neonatal intensive care unit.</p>
<p>The study found that most U.S. childhood deaths occur during the neonatal period and most neonatal deaths are caused by a decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining measures. Of the 414 infant  deaths studied, 45 percent were due to major birth defects. Seventeen percent of these infants were very preterm and 35 percent of deaths were of very preterm births without congenital birth defects or <a href="http://www.birthtraumalaw.com/brain_injury.html" title="Link to information about brain injury at birth">brain injury</a>, said the study.</p>
<p>The study published in the Archives of Pediatrics &#038; Adolescent Medicine found that during the 10-year period, 61.6 percent of infant deaths followed withdrawal of treatment, 20.8 percent followed withholding of treatment and 17.6 percent died despite attempted resuscitation.</p>
<p>Admission diagnoses for the Children’s Mercy Hospital were placed into three categories: very preterm, congenital anomaly and other including children being born after 32 weeks without congenital anomalies. Although the study found no change in frequency of withdrawal of treatment, there was a significant increase in withholding of treatment for very preterm infants.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP. – <strong><a title="Meet Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP birth trauma lawyers" href="http://www.birthtraumalaw.com/attorneys.html" target="_blank">birth trauma lawyers</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/07/withdrawal-of-treatment-top-cause-of-death-in-nicu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flu Vaccine May Reduce Premature Birth Risk</title>
		<link>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/06/flu-vaccine-may-reduce-premature-birth-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/06/flu-vaccine-may-reduce-premature-birth-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Premature Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth trauma attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth trauma lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/?p=5082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to WebMD, pregnant women who get a flu vaccine are less likely to have low birth weight babies and reduced risk of premature birth. A new study has shown that women who receive a flu vaccine during pregnancy were less likely to have a premature birth than unvaccinated mothers. The study found that influenza and pneumonia increase the risk of premature birth and low birth weight. Vaccinations during pregnancy protect the mother and the infant from the most common viruses that cause respiratory infections.</p>
<p>The study, published in PLoS Medicine, looked at the relationship between flu vaccination and the risk of premature birth before 37 weeks gestation and babies born small for gestational age. Researchers studies 4,168 women who gave birth between 2004 and 2006. The study found that vaccinated mothers were 40% less likely to have a premature birth. During the eight weeks of the most widespread flu activity, the risk of premature birth was about 70% lower among vaccinated mothers than among mothers who did not receive the flu vaccine during their pregnancy.</p>
<p>Mothers who received the flu vaccine during pregnancy were 69% less likely to give birth to a low birth weight infant. This research did not indicated if a flu vaccine during pregnancy could lead to birth defects. The study was observational only that found an association between flu vaccination during pregnancy and reduced risk of premature birth and low birth weight. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings. A <a href="http://www.birthtraumalaw.com/attorneys.html" title="Meet Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP  birth injury attorneys>birth injury attorney</a> can answer your questions about birth defects caused by medications.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to WebMD, pregnant women who get a flu vaccine are less likely to have low birth weight babies and reduced risk of premature birth. A new study has shown that women who receive a flu vaccine during pregnancy were less likely to have a premature birth than unvaccinated mothers. The study found that influenza and pneumonia increase the risk of premature birth and low birth weight. Vaccinations during pregnancy protect the mother and the infant from the most common viruses that cause respiratory infections.</p>
<p>The study, published in PLoS Medicine, looked at the relationship between flu vaccination and the risk of premature birth before 37 weeks gestation and babies born small for gestational age. Researchers studies 4,168 women who gave birth between 2004 and 2006. The study found that vaccinated mothers were 40% less likely to have a premature birth. During the eight weeks of the most widespread flu activity, the risk of premature birth was about 70% lower among vaccinated mothers than among mothers who did not receive the flu vaccine during their pregnancy.</p>
<p>Mothers who received the flu vaccine during pregnancy were 69% less likely to give birth to a low birth weight infant. This research did not indicated if a flu vaccine during pregnancy could lead to birth defects. The study was observational only that found an association between flu vaccination during pregnancy and reduced risk of premature birth and low birth weight. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings. A <a href="http://www.birthtraumalaw.com/attorneys.html" title="Meet Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP  birth injury attorneys>birth injury attorney</a> can answer your questions about birth defects caused by medications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/06/flu-vaccine-may-reduce-premature-birth-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Premature Birth May Be Linked to Family History</title>
		<link>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/05/premature-birth-may-be-linked-to-family-history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/05/premature-birth-may-be-linked-to-family-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 12:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Premature Birth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/?p=5033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to MSNBC, premature birth may run in families. Tammy George was a small baby even before her mother went into labor 11 weeks early. The doctors worried she was not receiving enough nutrition in the womb. In the delivery room, Tammy weighed less than a loaf of bread. In the 1970s, a premature baby that small, 1 pound, 8 ounces, had very slim chances of survival. According to new studies, genetic links suggest that there may be a link between premature births and family history.</p>
<p>Tammy spent two months in the hospital before being released. As an adult, she found herself giving birth via c-section to her premature baby, Hannah, after her water broke 28 weeks into pregnancy. Tammy was told her baby would have 80 percent chance of survival and possible developmental problems.</p>
<p>A study of 14,000 UK women found that being born prematurely increased a woman’s chance of having a premature baby by nearly 50 percent. Even having a sibling born prematurely raised the odds of having a premature child in the future.</p>
<p>Tammy’s newborn daughter was delivered by the same neonatologist who had treated her almost 30 years earlier. At the time of her birth, Tammy was considered extremely premature and was expected to have problems growing up. Dr. Alan Lantzy who treated both Tammy and her preemie daughter said that most babies born that small died of breathing problems but today at least 90 percent of those children survive thanks to advances in technology and treatment for premature lungs.</p>
<p>Tammy had other children who were all born prematurely before 36 weeks.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to MSNBC, premature birth may run in families. Tammy George was a small baby even before her mother went into labor 11 weeks early. The doctors worried she was not receiving enough nutrition in the womb. In the delivery room, Tammy weighed less than a loaf of bread. In the 1970s, a premature baby that small, 1 pound, 8 ounces, had very slim chances of survival. According to new studies, genetic links suggest that there may be a link between premature births and family history.</p>
<p>Tammy spent two months in the hospital before being released. As an adult, she found herself giving birth via c-section to her premature baby, Hannah, after her water broke 28 weeks into pregnancy. Tammy was told her baby would have 80 percent chance of survival and possible developmental problems.</p>
<p>A study of 14,000 UK women found that being born prematurely increased a woman’s chance of having a premature baby by nearly 50 percent. Even having a sibling born prematurely raised the odds of having a premature child in the future.</p>
<p>Tammy’s newborn daughter was delivered by the same neonatologist who had treated her almost 30 years earlier. At the time of her birth, Tammy was considered extremely premature and was expected to have problems growing up. Dr. Alan Lantzy who treated both Tammy and her preemie daughter said that most babies born that small died of breathing problems but today at least 90 percent of those children survive thanks to advances in technology and treatment for premature lungs.</p>
<p>Tammy had other children who were all born prematurely before 36 weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/05/premature-birth-may-be-linked-to-family-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progesterone Gel May Prevent Preterm Birth</title>
		<link>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/04/progesterone-gel-may-prevent-preterm-birth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/04/progesterone-gel-may-prevent-preterm-birth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Premature Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cervix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hormone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preterm birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prochieve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[progesterone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short cervix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/?p=5000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to MSNBC, a simple treatment help prevent <a href="http://birthtraumalaw.com/">preterm births</a> by nearly half. A late-stage study of the vaginal gel made by Columbia Laboratories Inc and Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc found hope in preventing premature birth in women with a short cervix. Treating pregnant women participants with the hormone progesterone cut their rate of premature delivery by 45 percent, the researchers said. </p>
<p>The study published in the journal Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology will be used to support the companies’ application for marketing approval of the hormone gel. The gel is known by the brand Prochieve. In the study, researchers at the National Institutes of Health and 44 medical centers around the world looked at effects of giving progesterone to women with a short cervix. Researchers suspect that women with a short cervix do not have enough of the hormone, and giving it during pregnancies helps prolong the gestational period.</p>
<p>The team studied 458 women with a short cervix who used either a vaginal progesterone gel or a placebo between the 19th and 23rd week of pregnancy. About 8.9 percent of women who used the gel delivered babies before the 33rd week of pregnancy, compared with 16.2 percent of women using a placebo.</p>
<p>The researchers found that babies benefited from progesterone as well, as only 3 percent of babies born to women treated with the gel experienced respiratory distress syndrome. In the U.S., 12.8 percent of babies were born preterm in 2008. Preterm birth raises the risk of development disorders, brain injuries, breathing difficulties, and death.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to MSNBC, a simple treatment help prevent <a href="http://birthtraumalaw.com/">preterm births</a> by nearly half. A late-stage study of the vaginal gel made by Columbia Laboratories Inc and Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc found hope in preventing premature birth in women with a short cervix. Treating pregnant women participants with the hormone progesterone cut their rate of premature delivery by 45 percent, the researchers said. </p>
<p>The study published in the journal Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology will be used to support the companies’ application for marketing approval of the hormone gel. The gel is known by the brand Prochieve. In the study, researchers at the National Institutes of Health and 44 medical centers around the world looked at effects of giving progesterone to women with a short cervix. Researchers suspect that women with a short cervix do not have enough of the hormone, and giving it during pregnancies helps prolong the gestational period.</p>
<p>The team studied 458 women with a short cervix who used either a vaginal progesterone gel or a placebo between the 19th and 23rd week of pregnancy. About 8.9 percent of women who used the gel delivered babies before the 33rd week of pregnancy, compared with 16.2 percent of women using a placebo.</p>
<p>The researchers found that babies benefited from progesterone as well, as only 3 percent of babies born to women treated with the gel experienced respiratory distress syndrome. In the U.S., 12.8 percent of babies were born preterm in 2008. Preterm birth raises the risk of development disorders, brain injuries, breathing difficulties, and death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/04/progesterone-gel-may-prevent-preterm-birth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Premature Babies Are At Higher Risk of Diabetes, Study Finds</title>
		<link>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/04/premature-babies-are-at-higher-risk-of-diabetes-study-finds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/04/premature-babies-are-at-higher-risk-of-diabetes-study-finds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Premature Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diabetes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premature babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/?p=4988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to MSNBC, diabetes risk may be slightly higher in <a href="http://birthtraumalaw.com/">premature babies</a>. According to a Swedish study, children who spent less time in the womb had a slightly higher risk, less than 1 percent, of developing diabetes at a later time in their life.</p>
<p>In the U.S., the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that 3 of every 25 babies are delivered prematurely. Premature babies face a lot of developmental risks, but diabetes could lead to other risk factors such as high blood pressure. </p>
<p>The research team, along with Dr. Casey Crump of Stanford University, used a national prescription database to track the use of diabetes medications by 630,000 people in Sweden born between 1973 and 1979. Roughly 28,000 of those individuals were born premature, the study found.</p>
<p>Crump’s team found that 15 out of 100 preemies developed diabetes by the time they were in their twenties and thirties. Majority of the cases were type 1 diabetes, requiring insulin without oral medication. </p>
<p>Crump said that it is unclear why early birth associated with diabetes, but said that additional research is necessary in that field. It could be that poor nutrition can trigger changes in the baby’s hormones during gestation, which may increase the risk of diabetes. Diabetes is also less common in Sweden than in the U.S, Crump said. The researchers also said that premature babies need to worry about other factors such as family history and obesity, as two thirds of Americans are considered overweight.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to MSNBC, diabetes risk may be slightly higher in <a href="http://birthtraumalaw.com/">premature babies</a>. According to a Swedish study, children who spent less time in the womb had a slightly higher risk, less than 1 percent, of developing diabetes at a later time in their life.</p>
<p>In the U.S., the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that 3 of every 25 babies are delivered prematurely. Premature babies face a lot of developmental risks, but diabetes could lead to other risk factors such as high blood pressure. </p>
<p>The research team, along with Dr. Casey Crump of Stanford University, used a national prescription database to track the use of diabetes medications by 630,000 people in Sweden born between 1973 and 1979. Roughly 28,000 of those individuals were born premature, the study found.</p>
<p>Crump’s team found that 15 out of 100 preemies developed diabetes by the time they were in their twenties and thirties. Majority of the cases were type 1 diabetes, requiring insulin without oral medication. </p>
<p>Crump said that it is unclear why early birth associated with diabetes, but said that additional research is necessary in that field. It could be that poor nutrition can trigger changes in the baby’s hormones during gestation, which may increase the risk of diabetes. Diabetes is also less common in Sweden than in the U.S, Crump said. The researchers also said that premature babies need to worry about other factors such as family history and obesity, as two thirds of Americans are considered overweight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/04/premature-babies-are-at-higher-risk-of-diabetes-study-finds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Makena Drug Prices May Increase Premature Births</title>
		<link>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/03/makena-drug-prices-may-increase-premature-births/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/03/makena-drug-prices-may-increase-premature-births/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Premature Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Makena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preemie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preterm birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preterm labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/?p=4958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to MSNBC, a drug preventing preterm labor is about to have a major price change that could negatively impact pregnant women at risk of going into labor too early. KV Pharmaceutical received government approval to be an exclusive seller of the drug Makena. The change prompted the company to skyrocket the price, from $10 per injection to $1500 per injection. Pregnant women at risk of preterm labor may start the drug early in the pregnancy, which means the total cost during a pregnancy could be as much as $30,000 for Makena shots.</p>
<p>The March of Dimes and many medical experts supported KV Pharmaceuticals attempts at getting exclusive government approval. The groups believed it would help with quality and availability of the medication. However, no one suspected that such a major price change would take effect.</p>
<p>Some medical experts and patient-safety advocates fear this drastic new price will have a negative impact on low income families and may lead to an increase in preterm births, instead of helping families avoid the mental and physical disabilities that can come with very <a href="http://birthtraumalaw.com/">premature births</a>. The cost of a newborn preemie baby is estimated at $51,000 during the first year alone. Other concerns are that some insurance companies will not be able to cover Makena or will raise premiums. Perhaps, the state run Medicare programs will drop the preterm labor drug and choose not to cover the outrageous new costs. Many pregnant women depend on Medicare programs, denying to pay for an important prenatal drug could significantly increase preterm births, instead of preventing them.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to MSNBC, a drug preventing preterm labor is about to have a major price change that could negatively impact pregnant women at risk of going into labor too early. KV Pharmaceutical received government approval to be an exclusive seller of the drug Makena. The change prompted the company to skyrocket the price, from $10 per injection to $1500 per injection. Pregnant women at risk of preterm labor may start the drug early in the pregnancy, which means the total cost during a pregnancy could be as much as $30,000 for Makena shots.</p>
<p>The March of Dimes and many medical experts supported KV Pharmaceuticals attempts at getting exclusive government approval. The groups believed it would help with quality and availability of the medication. However, no one suspected that such a major price change would take effect.</p>
<p>Some medical experts and patient-safety advocates fear this drastic new price will have a negative impact on low income families and may lead to an increase in preterm births, instead of helping families avoid the mental and physical disabilities that can come with very <a href="http://birthtraumalaw.com/">premature births</a>. The cost of a newborn preemie baby is estimated at $51,000 during the first year alone. Other concerns are that some insurance companies will not be able to cover Makena or will raise premiums. Perhaps, the state run Medicare programs will drop the preterm labor drug and choose not to cover the outrageous new costs. Many pregnant women depend on Medicare programs, denying to pay for an important prenatal drug could significantly increase preterm births, instead of preventing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/03/makena-drug-prices-may-increase-premature-births/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preterm Births May Be Caused By Placental Bacteria Colonizations</title>
		<link>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/02/preterm-births-may-be-caused-by-placental-bacteria-colonizations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/02/preterm-births-may-be-caused-by-placental-bacteria-colonizations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 02:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Premature Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developmental problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newborn babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Placental Bacteria Colonizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premature birth study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preterm birth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/?p=4900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to My Health Bowl, a study at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Children’s Hospital and at Harvard Medical School have found that there is a bacteria that colonizes the placenta in the womb, causing <a href="http://birthtraumalaw.com/">pre-term births</a> in pregnant women. This bacteria is also noted to potentially cause developmental problems within the affected newborn babies. </p>
<p>According to researchers, the bacteria colonizes following the onset of a fetal injury. It contributes to pre-term labor and may cause lifelong underlying health issues for the affected child. </p>
<p>Depending upon the type of bacteria or organisms that form the colony in the placenta, the child may suffer from an increased or decreased risk of systemic inflammatory condition. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, researchers have found that intrauterine infections are the most common cause of pre-term childbirth or other injuries to a growing baby. </p>
<p>The bacteria colonies were discovered via cultures that were taken from the placentas that were delivered prior to the second trimester as well as 41 percent of placentas delivered by caesarean section. </p>
<p>It was noted that the higher levels of pro-inflammatory protein was found in newborns were related to the bacteria that occurs with bacterial vaginosis (also known as bacterial vaginitis.) </p>
<p>One author of the study, Andrew Ondedonk, notes that the colonization of bacteria appears to cause the fetal injury, resulting in the preterm birth; and that this information is verified by the work done in the study. </p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to My Health Bowl, a study at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Children’s Hospital and at Harvard Medical School have found that there is a bacteria that colonizes the placenta in the womb, causing <a href="http://birthtraumalaw.com/">pre-term births</a> in pregnant women. This bacteria is also noted to potentially cause developmental problems within the affected newborn babies. </p>
<p>According to researchers, the bacteria colonizes following the onset of a fetal injury. It contributes to pre-term labor and may cause lifelong underlying health issues for the affected child. </p>
<p>Depending upon the type of bacteria or organisms that form the colony in the placenta, the child may suffer from an increased or decreased risk of systemic inflammatory condition. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, researchers have found that intrauterine infections are the most common cause of pre-term childbirth or other injuries to a growing baby. </p>
<p>The bacteria colonies were discovered via cultures that were taken from the placentas that were delivered prior to the second trimester as well as 41 percent of placentas delivered by caesarean section. </p>
<p>It was noted that the higher levels of pro-inflammatory protein was found in newborns were related to the bacteria that occurs with bacterial vaginosis (also known as bacterial vaginitis.) </p>
<p>One author of the study, Andrew Ondedonk, notes that the colonization of bacteria appears to cause the fetal injury, resulting in the preterm birth; and that this information is verified by the work done in the study. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthtraumalawblog.com/2011/02/preterm-births-may-be-caused-by-placental-bacteria-colonizations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

